Mob : +91 92554 42103
Email id: iahrw2019@gmail.com
Mob : +91 92554 42103
Mob : +91 92554 42103
Email id: iahrw2019@gmail.com
Mob : +91 92554 42103
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review is an indexed and refereed journal published monthly by the Indian Association of Health, Research, and Welfare (IAHRW). IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review likely aims to promote interdisciplinary research in social sciences by providing a platform for scholars, academicians, and professionals. Its primary objectives include fostering discussions on contemporary social issues, policy-making, and human development while encouraging evidence-based research in sociology, psychology, political science, economics, and cultural studies. The journal focuses on areas such as social behavior, education, governance, gender studies, mental health, and societal well-being. Its goals include publishing high-quality research, supporting academic discourse, and contributing to knowledge that influences social policies and community development. IAHRW IJSSR is a peer-reviewed journal, and the papers are published after a review process by the review panel of the journal. This journal has been published regularly since 2013. For more details write to us at iahrw2019@gmail.com
Editor-in-Chief: Sunil Saini, PhD, President Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: International Bibliography of Social Sciences (IBSS), DHET (South Africa), EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest Social Sciences Database, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42
CHIEF EDITOR
Sunil Saini, PhD
Indian Association of Health Research and Welfare, Hisar, Haryana, India
INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD
Rankoana Sejabaledi Agnes, PhD, University of Limpopo, South Africa
Sakhile Manyathi, PhD, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
EDITORS
Dr. Arun Kumar Jaiswal, PhD
Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4430-6063
Dr. C. R. Darolia, PhD
Department of Psychology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3282-2733
Dr. Damanjit Sandhu, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID ID: ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8368-0133
Dr. Rekha Sapra, PhD
Department of Human Development and Family Empowerment, University of Delhi
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7610-3549
Dr. Sangeeta Trama, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9257-8722
Dr. Shashi Darolia
Department of Psychology, IIHS, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID: 0009-0001-7761-3441
Dr. Waheeda Khan, PhD
Former Dean and Head, Department of Clinical Psychology, SGT University, Gurugram
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4384-7047
Dr. Jaspreet Kaur, PhD, Punjabi University Patiala
Dr. Ritesh Kumar Singh, PhD, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
Dr. Radhy Shyam, PhD, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Dr. Sandeep Singh, PhD, GJUS&T, Hisar, Haryana
Dr. Sunita Malhotra, PhD, Former Dean, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: iahrw2019@gmail.com, suneil_psy@iahrw.org
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42Stellenbosch University, South Africa Human Development and Family Empowermen
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by the Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW). The journal publishes original research articles, review papers, theoretical papers, case studies, book reviews, and short communications in the fields of social sciences, psychology, sociology, education, economics, political science, social work, management, public policy, behavioural sciences, and related interdisciplinary areas.
Manuscripts submitted to the journal must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Submission of a manuscript implies that all authors have approved the manuscript and agree to the journal’s publication policies.
The title page should contain:
Provide an abstract of 150–250 words summarizing objectives, methodology, findings, and conclusions.
Provide 4–6 keywords suitable for indexing and retrieval.
Manuscripts should generally include:
All references must follow APA 7th Edition guidelines and include DOI information wherever available.
Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively and prepared according to APA guidelines.
All sources of financial support, grants, sponsorships, equipment, or institutional support must be disclosed.
Authors must declare any financial, professional, institutional, or personal conflicts of interest that may influence the research.
Authors are encouraged to provide a contribution statement based on the CRediT Taxonomy.
Authors should indicate whether data supporting the findings are publicly available, available upon request, or subject to restrictions.
Authors may use AI tools for language editing and technical assistance. AI systems cannot be listed as authors, and all use of AI must be disclosed.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for copyrighted materials reproduced in their manuscripts.
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review adheres to the principles and best practices recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct.
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are original. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, citation manipulation, and image manipulation are strictly prohibited.
A manuscript submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by another journal simultaneously.
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to the research and manuscript preparation. Guest, gift, and ghost authorship are not acceptable.
Research involving human participants must receive approval from an appropriate ethics committee or institutional review board. Informed consent should be obtained where applicable.
Authors must protect the privacy and confidentiality of research participants and avoid publishing identifiable information without explicit consent.
Authors are expected to present accurate data and findings. Any discovered errors should be promptly reported to the editor.
The journal investigates allegations of:
Appropriate actions may include rejection, correction, retraction, or notification to the relevant institutions.
The journal follows COPE recommendations regarding corrections, corrigenda, errata, expressions of concern, and retractions.
Authors must disclose any significant use of AI tools in manuscript preparation and remain fully responsible for the content submitted.
All participants in the publication process are expected to comply with internationally recognized publication ethics standards and COPE Core Practices.
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing follows ethical publishing standards and may have specific policies regarding the use of AI in research and writing. Authors are expected to disclose the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, ensuring that AI-generated content does not compromise originality, accuracy, or ethical integrity. For precise guidelines, it is recommended to refer to the journal’s official policy. AI content by Turnitin should be below 15%
Retraction, Correction, and Expression of Concern Policy
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing (IJHW) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. The journal follows the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in handling corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions.
Corrections (Erratum/Corrigendum)
A correction may be issued when a published article contains significant errors that affect the accuracy, indexing, interpretation, or reputation of the publication but do not invalidate the study’s findings. Corrections may be initiated by authors, editors, or readers.
• An Erratum is issued when the error originates from the journal or publisher.
• A Corrigendum is issued when the error originates from the author(s).
• All corrections will be linked electronically to the original article and clearly identify the changes made.
Expression of Concern
The Editor-in-Chief may publish an Expression of Concern when substantial doubts arise regarding the integrity, reliability, ethical compliance, or authorship of a published article, and an investigation is ongoing. The notice will remain associated with the article until a final decision is reached.
Retraction Policy
Articles may be retracted if:
• There is clear evidence that findings are unreliable due to misconduct or honest error.
• The work constitutes plagiarism, duplicate publication, or redundant publication.
• Data fabrication, falsification, image manipulation, or unethical research practices are identified.
• Serious violations of publication ethics are confirmed.
Retraction Procedure
Authors may appeal editorial decisions regarding corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions by submitting a written explanation and supporting documentation to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals will be reviewed independently, and the final decision of the Editorial Board shall be binding. The journal reserves the right to update published content when necessary to protect the integrity of the scientific record and the interests of readers, researchers, and the public.
Authors are required to disclose on the title page of the initial manuscript any potential, perceived, or real conflict of interest. Authors must describe the direct/indirect financial/personal support (ownership, grants, honorarium, consultancies, etc.) in (1) the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; (2) the writing of the report; and (3) the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Authors should explicitly mention on the cover page that whether potential conflicts do or do not exit. A declaration should be made on the cover page for all types of conflicts that could affect submission to publication of a manuscript. The role of funding agencies should be clearly mentioned.
Editorial Office: 1245/18, Moh. Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India,
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com,
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted to the IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) are subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality and ethically sound research. Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, academic significance, methodological quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that successfully pass the preliminary evaluation are screened for plagiarism using recognized similarity detection software, and generally a similarity index below 15% (excluding references) is considered acceptable. Eligible manuscripts are then sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s originality, theoretical and practical contribution, research design, methodological rigor, data analysis, ethical standards, clarity of presentation, and overall suitability for publication. Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the authors for revision where necessary. The original reviewers may re-evaluate revised manuscripts before a final decision is made. Based on the reviewers’ reports and editorial assessment, the Editor may decide to accept the manuscript, accept it with revisions, request major revisions, invite resubmission, or reject the manuscript. The final decision regarding publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
Manuscript Evaluation and Peer Review Process
1. Initial Manuscript Evaluation
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, scientific quality, ethical compliance, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall suitability for peer review.
2. Number of Referees Assigned
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial evaluation are typically sent to two independent expert reviewers for double-blind peer review. In cases of conflicting recommendations, a third reviewer may be invited.
3. Delivery of Peer Review Feedback
Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the corresponding author through the journal’s editorial system or email. Anonymous reviewer reports are provided along with editorial guidance for revision, where applicable.
4. Typical Length of Peer Review
The peer review process generally takes 4–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability, the complexity of the manuscript, and the timeliness of responses.
5. Handling of Revise and Resubmit Requests
Authors receiving a revision decision are requested to submit a revised manuscript along with a detailed point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. Revised submissions may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.
6. Editorial Decisions
Based on reviewers’ recommendations and editorial assessment, one of the following decisions may be communicated to the author:
Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality regarding manuscripts and associated materials.
Reviewers and editors must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when appropriate.
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a written justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Complaints regarding editorial procedures, peer review, or publication ethics may be submitted to the editorial office and will be handled confidentially and fairly.
Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit and are free from commercial, institutional, political, or personal influence.
The journal is committed to maintaining transparency, fairness, integrity, and accountability throughout the peer review and publication process in accordance with COPE principles and international best practices.
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board and is communicated to the corresponding author through email along with the relevant comments and recommendations.
Page: 118-120 Yashvi (Nutrition and Dietetics, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana) Quality of life forms an important aspect of any group of population. Geriatric population has increased since the past few years and is expected to further rise. Maintaining a good quality of life among the geriatric population is one of the main aims of gerontology. The quality of life of an individual is based on how he perceives the idea of living. According to the world health organisation the quality of life of an individual can be measured by characterising it into four main domains which includes physical domain, psychological domain, social domain and environmental domain. These four domains are further affected by various facets. This study aims at understanding the impact of the environment on the quality of life among the elderly population. The study involved 100 participants above the age of 60 years from Delhi NCR region. A questionnaire standardised by WHO was adopted and required changes were made. Reliability and testing were done using Cronbach's alpha test. The questionnaire was floated through online channels like emails, WhatsApp, and Facebook. The obtained results were converted into transformed scores and mean and standard deviation were calculated. The environmental domain score was calculated to be 11.69±1.692. t-test was applied to compare the scores obtained by males and females in the environmental domain. The results from t-test showed no significant difference in the quality of life scores between male and female individuals. |
Page: 121-123 Nitin Goyal1, Ankita Sharma2, Subodh Agarwal3, and Darvinder Kumar4 (Department of Business Management, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana1,2,3 and Department of Statistics, PGDAV College, University of Delhi, Delhi4) When people think of coffee, they usually think of its ability to provide an energy boost. Coffee contains a number of useful nutrients, including riboflavin (vitamin B2), niacin (vitamin B3), magnesium, potassium, and various phenolic compounds, or antioxidants. The two most commonly grown coffee bean types are C. arabica and C. robusta. This paper, attempts to analyze the growth, level of variability/instability in area, production and productivity for both the varieties of coffee collectively and to estimate the export competitiveness of coffee grown in India using the data for the period 2000-2001 to 2019-2020. Compound growth rate technique was used to analyze the growth rate and instability was estimated using Coppock's instability index. Relative symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) technique was used to analyze the export competitiveness. The study revealed that coffee reported a positive growth rate in area (1.60%) whereas yield declined slightly at the rate of 0.76 percent per annum. The positive growth in area outpaced negative growth in yield resulting thereby positive growth in production at the rate of 0.82 percent. Highest instability was recorded for production (5.83%) which is due to the higher instability in yield (5.72%) as only small instability was recorded in area (0.88%). Further, the study indicates that there was a variation in export competitiveness of coffee from India during the period under study. India had a comparative advantage in the exports of coffee during 2000-01 to 2010-11 and 2015-16 to 2018-19 as RCA values are more than one and RSCA values are positive during this period. In rest of the years it was found comparatively non-competitive. It indicates that India has potential in coffee export. |
Page: 124-126 Yashvi (Nutrition and Dietetics, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana) The 21st century has observed an increase in the geriatric population over the years. Population of this age group is expected to outnumber the other groups of population. Therefore a good Quality of life has become one of the major concerns of the geriatric care. This study aims to study the quality of life among geriatric populations residing in Delhi region. Materials and methods: This study involved 100 individuals aged 60 years and above (70.58±7.845) from Delhi NCR region through an online survey carried out using a questionnaire developed by WHO and changes were made according to the requirements. t-test was applied for comparison of scores obtained by males and females. Results: Mean scores obtained in physical, psychological, social and environmental domain to be 11.0±1.573, 10.34±1.628, 10.13±2.023, 11.69±1.692 respectively. No significant difference was observed between qol scores of males and females. Conclusion: QOL is independent of the gender of the individual. Better QOL is experienced with better physical conditions, mental state, support from family and friends, better economic conditions and environment. Key words: Quality of life, geriatric population, Delhi region. |
Investigation of Factors Influencing the Inclination of Young People towards Fast Food in Herat City Page: 01-04 Abdul Ali Karimi1, Fazel Rahman Fazel2, Sayed Mohammad Faqiri3, and Mohammad Farid Fahiz4 (Department of Biology, Education Faculty, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan1, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan2,4, and Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan3) |
Page: 05-08 Sejabaledi A. Rankoana (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 09-13 Mathebula N.E. (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 14-20 Likhwa Ncube (Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, South Africa) |
Page: 21-28 Munzhedzi Pandelani Harry1 and Arthur Shopola2 (Department of Public & Development Administration, University of Venda, South Africa1 and Department of Public Administration and Local Government, North West University, South Africa2) |
Page: 29-32 Sejabaledi A. Rankoana (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 33-41 Patrick A. Nyathi (Department of Languages and Social Sciences, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa) |
Page: 42-49 Aasa T. and Annalakshmi N. (Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu) |
Page: 50-54 Krishna S. Maraddi1, P. S. Kattimani2, and Vidya V. Hanchinal3 (Deputy Librarian, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad1, Librarian, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi2, and Librarian, SKM's J M Patel College of Commerce, Goregaon (W), Mumbai3) |
Page: 55-59 Preeti1, Vinod Kumari2, Ruchi3, and Ajay Sharma4 (Department of Sociology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana1,2,3 and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana4) |
Page: 60-64 Pratibha Khutan1 and Suninder Tung2 (Department of Psychology, DAV University, Jalandhar, Punjab1 and Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab2) |
Page: 65-68 Tamsha and Sandeep Singh (Department of Applied Psychology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 69-73 Safina and Habeebul Rahiman (Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi) |
Page: 74-80 Subhash Chander, Jatesh Kathpalia, Vinod Kumari, and Bas Kaur (Department of Sociology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 81-84 Saima Nazir1 and Khushboo Nazir2 (Department of Commerce, University of Kashmir, J&K1, Accounts Officer GIF, NIT, Sri Nagar2) |
Page: 85-89 Namita Mohanty (Department of Psychology, KISS-DU, Bhubaneswar, Odisha) |
Page: 90-97 Vikrant Hooda and Ritu Hooda (School of Commerce and Management (SCM), Om Sterling Global University, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 98-103 Divya Rani and Neena Kohli (Department of Psychology, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj0 |
Page: 104-107 Sunanda (Department of Home Science, Adarsh Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhiwani, Haryana) |
Page: 108-110 Cheryl Jolly and Shivani (Department of Psychology, School of Liberal Arts, Noida International University, Greater Noida) |
Page: 111-115 Rupan Dhillon (Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab) |
Page: 116-118 Sunanda (Department of Home Science, Adarsh Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhiwani, Haryana) |