IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review is an indexed and refereed journal published monthly by the Indian Association of Health, Research, and Welfare (IAHRW). IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review likely aims to promote interdisciplinary research in social sciences by providing a platform for scholars, academicians, and professionals. Its primary objectives include fostering discussions on contemporary social issues, policy-making, and human development while encouraging evidence-based research in sociology, psychology, political science, economics, and cultural studies. The journal focuses on areas such as social behavior, education, governance, gender studies, mental health, and societal well-being. Its goals include publishing high-quality research, supporting academic discourse, and contributing to knowledge that influences social policies and community development. IAHRW IJSSR is a peer-reviewed journal, and the papers are published after a review process by the review panel of the journal. This journal has been published regularly since 2013. For more details write to us at iahrw2019@gmail.com
Editor-in-Chief: Sunil Saini, PhD, President Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: International Bibliography of Social Sciences (IBSS), DHET (South Africa), EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest Social Sciences Database, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42
CHIEF EDITOR
Sunil Saini, PhD
Indian Association of Health Research and Welfare, Hisar, Haryana, India
INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD
Rankoana Sejabaledi Agnes, PhD, University of Limpopo, South Africa
Sakhile Manyathi, PhD, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
EDITORS
Dr. Arun Kumar Jaiswal, PhD
Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4430-6063
Dr. C. R. Darolia, PhD
Department of Psychology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3282-2733
Dr. Damanjit Sandhu, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID ID: ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8368-0133
Dr. Rekha Sapra, PhD
Department of Human Development and Family Empowerment, University of Delhi
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7610-3549
Dr. Sangeeta Trama, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9257-8722
Dr. Shashi Darolia
Department of Psychology, IIHS, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID: 0009-0001-7761-3441
Dr. Waheeda Khan, PhD
Former Dean and Head, Department of Clinical Psychology, SGT University, Gurugram
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4384-7047
Dr. Jaspreet Kaur, PhD, Punjabi University Patiala
Dr. Ritesh Kumar Singh, PhD, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
Dr. Radhy Shyam, PhD, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Dr. Sandeep Singh, PhD, GJUS&T, Hisar, Haryana
Dr. Sunita Malhotra, PhD, Former Dean, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Reviewer’s Pannel (2025-2026)
2. Prof. Arun Kumari Jaiswal, Former Prof. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
3. Prof. Sangeeta Trama, Punjabi University, Patiala
4. Prof. Annalakshmi Narayanan, Bharhityar University
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: iahrw2019@gmail.com, suneil_psy@iahrw.org
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42Stellenbosch University, South Africa Human Development and Family Empowermen
Author Guidelines
About the Journal
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by the Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW). The journal publishes original research articles, review papers, theoretical papers, case studies, book reviews, and short communications in the fields of social sciences, psychology, sociology, education, economics, political science, social work, management, public policy, behavioural sciences, and related interdisciplinary areas.
Manuscript Submission
Manuscripts submitted to the journal must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Submission of a manuscript implies that all authors have approved the manuscript and agree to the journal’s publication policies.
Manuscript Preparation
Title Page
The title page should contain:
- Title of the manuscript
- Full names of all authors
- Institutional affiliations
- ORCID IDs (if available)
- Corresponding author details
- Author contribution statement
Abstract
Provide an abstract of 150–250 words summarizing objectives, methodology, findings, and conclusions.
Keywords
Provide 4–6 keywords suitable for indexing and retrieval.
Main Text
Manuscripts should generally include:
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- Objectives/Hypotheses
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- References
References
All references must follow APA 7th Edition guidelines and include DOI information wherever available.
Tables and Figures
Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively and prepared according to APA guidelines.
Funding Statement
All sources of financial support, grants, sponsorships, equipment, or institutional support must be disclosed.
Conflict of Interest
Authors must declare any financial, professional, institutional, or personal conflicts of interest that may influence the research.
Author Contributions
Authors are encouraged to provide a contribution statement based on the CRediT Taxonomy.
Data Availability Statement
Authors should indicate whether data supporting the findings are publicly available, available upon request, or subject to restrictions.
Use of AI Tools
Authors may use AI tools for language editing and technical assistance. AI systems cannot be listed as authors, and all use of AI must be disclosed.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for copyrighted materials reproduced in their manuscripts.
Ethical Guidelines
Publication Ethics
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review adheres to the principles and best practices recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are original. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, citation manipulation, and image manipulation are strictly prohibited.
Multiple Submission
A manuscript submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by another journal simultaneously.
Authorship
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to the research and manuscript preparation. Guest, gift, and ghost authorship are not acceptable.
Research Involving Human Participants
Research involving human participants must receive approval from an appropriate ethics committee or institutional review board. Informed consent should be obtained where applicable.
Confidentiality and Privacy
Authors must protect the privacy and confidentiality of research participants and avoid publishing identifiable information without explicit consent.
Data Integrity
Authors are expected to present accurate data and findings. Any discovered errors should be promptly reported to the editor.
Research Misconduct
The journal investigates allegations of:
- Plagiarism
- Data fabrication
- Data falsification
- Duplicate publication
- Citation manipulation
- Authorship disputes
- Ethical violations
Appropriate actions may include rejection, correction, retraction, or notification to the relevant institutions.
Corrections and Retractions
The journal follows COPE recommendations regarding corrections, corrigenda, errata, expressions of concern, and retractions.
AI and Generative AI
Authors must disclose any significant use of AI tools in manuscript preparation and remain fully responsible for the content submitted.
Compliance with COPE
All participants in the publication process are expected to comply with internationally recognized publication ethics standards and COPE Core Practices.
AI-Generated Content Policy
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing follows ethical publishing standards and may have specific policies regarding the use of AI in research and writing. Authors are expected to disclose the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, ensuring that AI-generated content does not compromise originality, accuracy, or ethical integrity. For precise guidelines, it is recommended to refer to the journal’s official policy. AI content by Turnitin should be below 15%
Retraction and Correction Policy
Retraction, Correction, and Expression of Concern Policy
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing (IJHW) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. The journal follows the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in handling corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions.
Corrections (Erratum/Corrigendum)
A correction may be issued when a published article contains significant errors that affect the accuracy, indexing, interpretation, or reputation of the publication but do not invalidate the study’s findings. Corrections may be initiated by authors, editors, or readers.
• An Erratum is issued when the error originates from the journal or publisher.
• A Corrigendum is issued when the error originates from the author(s).
• All corrections will be linked electronically to the original article and clearly identify the changes made.
Expression of Concern
The Editor-in-Chief may publish an Expression of Concern when substantial doubts arise regarding the integrity, reliability, ethical compliance, or authorship of a published article, and an investigation is ongoing. The notice will remain associated with the article until a final decision is reached.
Retraction Policy
Articles may be retracted if:
• There is clear evidence that findings are unreliable due to misconduct or honest error.
• The work constitutes plagiarism, duplicate publication, or redundant publication.
• Data fabrication, falsification, image manipulation, or unethical research practices are identified.
• Serious violations of publication ethics are confirmed.
Retraction Procedure
- Allegations may be submitted by authors, reviewers, readers, institutions, or third parties.
- The editorial office will conduct a preliminary assessment.
- Authors will be contacted and provided an opportunity to respond.
- Where necessary, the journal may seek clarification from the affiliated institution or ethics committee.
- The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Editorial Board, will make the final decision.
- Retracted articles will remain accessible to preserve the scholarly record but will be clearly marked as “Retracted.”
- A retraction notice stating the reason for retraction will be published and linked to the original article.
Appeal
Authors may appeal editorial decisions regarding corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions by submitting a written explanation and supporting documentation to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals will be reviewed independently, and the final decision of the Editorial Board shall be binding. The journal reserves the right to update published content when necessary to protect the integrity of the scientific record and the interests of readers, researchers, and the public.
Conflict of Interest Policy
Authors are required to disclose on the title page of the initial manuscript any potential, perceived, or real conflict of interest. Authors must describe the direct/indirect financial/personal support (ownership, grants, honorarium, consultancies, etc.) in (1) the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; (2) the writing of the report; and (3) the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Authors should explicitly mention on the cover page that whether potential conflicts do or do not exit. A declaration should be made on the cover page for all types of conflicts that could affect submission to publication of a manuscript. The role of funding agencies should be clearly mentioned.
Editorial Office: 1245/18, Moh. Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India,
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com,
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted to the IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) are subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality and ethically sound research. Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, academic significance, methodological quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that successfully pass the preliminary evaluation are screened for plagiarism using recognized similarity detection software, and generally a similarity index below 15% (excluding references) is considered acceptable. Eligible manuscripts are then sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s originality, theoretical and practical contribution, research design, methodological rigor, data analysis, ethical standards, clarity of presentation, and overall suitability for publication. Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the authors for revision where necessary. The original reviewers may re-evaluate revised manuscripts before a final decision is made. Based on the reviewers’ reports and editorial assessment, the Editor may decide to accept the manuscript, accept it with revisions, request major revisions, invite resubmission, or reject the manuscript. The final decision regarding publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
Manuscript Evaluation and Peer Review Process
1. Initial Manuscript Evaluation
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, scientific quality, ethical compliance, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall suitability for peer review.
2. Number of Referees Assigned
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial evaluation are typically sent to two independent expert reviewers for double-blind peer review. In cases of conflicting recommendations, a third reviewer may be invited.
3. Delivery of Peer Review Feedback
Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the corresponding author through the journal’s editorial system or email. Anonymous reviewer reports are provided along with editorial guidance for revision, where applicable.
4. Typical Length of Peer Review
The peer review process generally takes 4–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability, the complexity of the manuscript, and the timeliness of responses.
5. Handling of Revise and Resubmit Requests
Authors receiving a revision decision are requested to submit a revised manuscript along with a detailed point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. Revised submissions may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.
6. Editorial Decisions
Based on reviewers’ recommendations and editorial assessment, one of the following decisions may be communicated to the author:
- Accept without Revision
- Accept with Minor Revisions
- Major Revisions Required
- Revise and Resubmit for Further Review
- Reject
Reviewer Confidentiality
Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality regarding manuscripts and associated materials.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers and editors must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when appropriate.
Appeals and Complaints
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a written justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Complaints regarding editorial procedures, peer review, or publication ethics may be submitted to the editorial office and will be handled confidentially and fairly.
Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit and are free from commercial, institutional, political, or personal influence.
Commitment to Ethical Publishing
The journal is committed to maintaining transparency, fairness, integrity, and accountability throughout the peer review and publication process in accordance with COPE principles and international best practices.
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board and is communicated to the corresponding author through email along with the relevant comments and recommendations.
Page: 320-325 Sihle Edmund Mpanza (Department of Public Administration, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa) |
Page: 326-333 Sophie Hlatywayo1, Tichaona Mapolisa2, and Lincoln Hlatywayo3 (Department of Educational Studies, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe1,2 and Department of Educational Studies, National University of Vanuatu, Vanuatu3) |
Page: 334-339 S. Manyathi and D. B. Jarbandhan (School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa) |
Page: 340-347 Adam Z. Sibiya, Daniel N. Mlambo, and Livhuwani L. Ndou (Department of Public Management, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa) |
Pagege: 348-355 M. Ragolane and T.L. Malatji (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa) |
Page: 356-365 D. Cornelius and Vain Jarbandhan (School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, Johannesburg, South Africa) |
Page: 366-370 Jackson Barngetuny (School of Business, University of Eastern Africa, Baraton, Kenya, East Africa) |
Page: 371-378 Ntombikayise M. Bhomoyi1, Daniel N. Mlambo2, Khathutshelo Matshela3, and Pearl Mokoena4 (Department of Development Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria1 and Department of Public Management, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa2,3,4) |
Page: 379-385 Thabo Saul and M.C. Maleka (Department of Public Affairs, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa) |
Page: 386-388 Engeline Zwane and Oupa Hlatshwayo (Department of Public Administration and Management, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 389-398 Clifford Mhlanyukwa Duma (Department of Sociology, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa) |
Page: 399-406 Renu, Kiran Singh, Komal, and Sarita Devi (Department of Resource Management and Consumer Science, I.C. College of Community Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 407-410 Tamanna Saini and Seema Sharma (Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab) |
Page: 411-416 Premkant D. Uparikar and Ranjita Kumari (Department of Clinical Psychology, Central India Institute, Dewada, Rajanandgaon, Chhattisgarh) |
Page: 417-422 Harleen Kaur Deo1, Radhika Rana2, and Rupan Dhillon3 (Navchetan Multispeciality Hospital, Pathankot, Punjab1, Viklele Consulting, Bavdhan, Pune, Maharashtra2, and Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab3) |
Page: 423-427 Sahil Boora, Subhash Chander, Bas Kaur, Manisha, and Mamta Chahal (Department of Sociology, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 428-432 Bijoy Bhattacharjee and Aditya Raj (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar) |
Page: 433-437 Gurmangeet Kaur Pandey (Pursuing MA in Sociology from Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi) |
Page: 438-442 Monika and Manju (Department of Applied Psychology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 443-446 Priyanka Panghal, Poonam Malik, Arju Saini, and Renu (Department of Human Development and Family Studies, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 01-06 Mona Vij (Ramgarhia College of Education, Phagwara, Punjab) Sawinder Arora Education is a process through which a child is made capable to attain the necessary competencies and skills to face the challenges in life to survive, and to make struggle for existence. Four important factors are identified for achieving the goal of education all these are access to education, enrolment of children, retention of the enrolled children and achievement. MidDayMealScheme is an effort to achieve and facilitate all above four objectives. Scheme is introduced by the govt. to provide lunch free of cost to school children on all working Days. The present study is related to the evaluation of MidDayMealScheme in elementary schools in Punjab. It focused on to study the role of MidDayMealScheme on student's Enrolment and attendance rate, to examine the quality of food available under MidDayMealScheme in elementary schools of Kapurthala district. It is concluded from the study that it has positive impact in enhancing enrolment and attendance but still it is not the only reason for high enrolment as well there is still need for improvement in quality of food in MDM Scheme. Nutritious value of food can be improved if we avoid excessive wash of food, less exposure of vegetables to air as well as avoid overheating. Students can get healthy and fresh food if proper clean utensils will be available and proper cleanliness be maintained in school. |
Page: 07-11 Rupinder Kaur Bajwa (Pathankot College of Education, Pathankot, Punjab) The present study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of concept mapping Teaching strategy on learning outcomes in social sciences subject of secondary school students. The sample of the study comprised of 80 students selected randomly from the private school of Pathankot district. The 60 items social science achievement test was constructed and validated. The present study had an experimental design, included an experimental group (n=40) and a control group (n=40) and used pre-test and post-test measures. Statistical difference has been found in favour of the experimental group. The results strongly support the effectiveness of concept mapping as a teaching strategy in improving the learning outcomes of secondary school students. The significant interaction effect indicative of the fact that Metacognition and Concept Mapping are not independent of each other. The present paper will give innovative ideas and thoughts to curriculum framers and textbook writers. Concept maps would also be helpful for the subject teachers to identify the causes of under-achievement among students and to remedy them. |
Page: 12-15 Gagan Deep (Department of Education, Punjabi University Regional Centre, Bathinda, Punjab) Teaching is not everybody's cup of tea rather it is an art that is learnt by undergoing a specific and rigorous training. Teachers have to be up to date regarding the changing trends in the educational system to ensure their effective role in teaching learning process. The extent of assertiveness, taking initiative, effective communication and a tendency to develop a sense of cooperative learning in the classroom will determine the level of effectiveness of teacher as a leader. Teacher's effectiveness in an educational process is determined by several psychological, social, economic and political factors such as his intellectual abilities, job satisfaction, socio-economic status, mental health, locus of control, self-efficacy etc. The present study attempts to explore the relationship between teacher effectiveness and locus of control of high school teachers of Punjab. In the present study, descriptive survey research method was employed. The teacher effectiveness scale by Kulsum (2000) and Locus of Control Scale by Vohra (2002) were administered for collecting data for the study in hand. The sample of the study consisted of 200 male and female high school teachers, selected through random cluster sampling technique, from the government and private schools of Bathinda district of Punjab. Pearson's Product Moment Correlation & t-test were used to analyze the teacher effectiveness and locus of control of high school teachers. The results revealed that high school teachers do not differ significantly on the variables of teacher effectiveness and locus of control across gender (Male & Female) and type of school (Government & Private). The findings of the study further indicated that there is no significant relationship between teacher effectiveness and locus of control of high school teachers. |
Page: 16-20 Yogesh Sharma (Ramgarhia College of Education, Phagwara, Punjab) The present study explored the B.Ed. students' conceptions of mathematical creativity. A questionnaire was used to investigate the conceptions of 95 pre-service secondary school teachers from four different colleges of education of Punjab state. The questionnaire had a total of ten items (two open & eight closed ended). The study showed that prospective teachers had certain misconceptions about mathematical creativity. Implications for teacher training and suggestions for further research are provided. |
Page: 21-26 Mona Vij (Ramgarhia College of Education, Phagwara, Punjab) Modern education demands the use of co-operative and collaborative strategies of learning. Many of life's most important tasks can only be accomplished in groups, and many group tasks are collective tasks that require the pooling of individual members inputs to achieve a common goal. Each member of the group contributes less than they would if they were individually responsible and this tendency of individuals is known as social loafing. There is complex link between social loafing and value orientation. Values go on updating with the growth of the students. To inculcate good values in the students there should be positive relation with each other's. The values formation can be influenced by gender. If individuals within a group feel that their productivity or inputs are not identifiable than social loafing is likely to occur. The present study is an investigation of social loafing behaviour among secondary school students in relation to their value orientation. In the present study purposive sampling technique was adopted. The population from which the sample selected was class IX students of District Kapurthala. The major findings are Students studying in different type of school, i.e., government and private differ significantly in overall task conditions of social loafing behaviour. Correlation between social loafing and value orientation shows that Value of the student is directly depends upon the school environment and It is important to make group members feel that their contribution are essential for the group success. In school, there should be well trained teacher and well equipped infrastructure, which will create a healthy environment to inspire students for group task. |
