Compare early maladaptive schemes and cognitive distortions in young people with schizoid personality disorder with ordinary people

Pages:527-530
Fatemeh Nasiri, Aminallah Fazel and Seyed Ahmad Mirjafari (Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran)

The aim of this study was to evaluate early maladaptive schemas and cognitive distortions in young adults with schizoid personality disorder with ordinary people. The aim of this study was causal-comparative design and applied research. The study population consisted of young people with schizoid personality disorder are referred to clinics and psychological services in the city and they are normal people. The sample size of young people with schizoid personality disorder referred to clinics and psychological services in the city of Shiraz in 2015 that number was 40 cases and 40 normal subjects who were matched for age and education level and randomly selected respectively. The instrument used in this study, the Young Schema Questionnaire (SQ-SF) (short form), cognitive distortions and scale questionnaire was schizoid personality. Usingthet-testto show the difference between the two groups in the primary and distorted cognitive schema variables there. Significant differences between the two groups in the scheme of mistrust/abuse, emotional deprivation, defectiveness/shame and social isolation/ alienation there. The scheme triggered/instability between the two groups was not significant. Significant differences between the two groups in the scheme vulnerable to loss / illness did not change his / caught and there is a failure. But in the scheme dependence / incompetence was no significant difference between the two groups. Significant differences between the two groups in the scheme of entitlement / grandiosity and self-control / self-discipline is inadequate. Significant differences between the two groups in the scheme of obedience and sacrifice there. Significant differences between the two groups in emotional inhibition schemas and there are strict criteria. The difference between the two groups in mean cognitive distortions all or nothing thinking, generalization exaggerated, subjective filter, lack of attention to the positive, hasty conclusions, mind reading, coarse-fine nose, nose emotional argument, labeling and personalization There are. But thinking in cognitive distortions word wrong and should be better between the two groups was not significant.