IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review is an indexed and refereed journal published monthly by the Indian Association of Health, Research, and Welfare (IAHRW). IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review likely aims to promote interdisciplinary research in social sciences by providing a platform for scholars, academicians, and professionals. Its primary objectives include fostering discussions on contemporary social issues, policy-making, and human development while encouraging evidence-based research in sociology, psychology, political science, economics, and cultural studies. The journal focuses on areas such as social behavior, education, governance, gender studies, mental health, and societal well-being. Its goals include publishing high-quality research, supporting academic discourse, and contributing to knowledge that influences social policies and community development. IAHRW IJSSR is a peer-reviewed journal, and the papers are published after a review process by the review panel of the journal. This journal has been published regularly since 2013. For more details write to us at iahrw2019@gmail.com
Editor-in-Chief: Sunil Saini, PhD, President Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: International Bibliography of Social Sciences (IBSS), DHET (South Africa), EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest Social Sciences Database, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42
CHIEF EDITOR
Sunil Saini, PhD
Indian Association of Health Research and Welfare, Hisar, Haryana, India
INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD
Rankoana Sejabaledi Agnes, PhD, University of Limpopo, South Africa
Sakhile Manyathi, PhD, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
EDITORS
Dr. Arun Kumar Jaiswal, PhD
Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4430-6063
Dr. C. R. Darolia, PhD
Department of Psychology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3282-2733
Dr. Damanjit Sandhu, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID ID: ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8368-0133
Dr. Rekha Sapra, PhD
Department of Human Development and Family Empowerment, University of Delhi
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7610-3549
Dr. Sangeeta Trama, PhD
Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, Patiala
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9257-8722
Dr. Shashi Darolia
Department of Psychology, IIHS, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
ORCID: 0009-0001-7761-3441
Dr. Waheeda Khan, PhD
Former Dean and Head, Department of Clinical Psychology, SGT University, Gurugram
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4384-7047
Dr. Jaspreet Kaur, PhD, Punjabi University Patiala
Dr. Ritesh Kumar Singh, PhD, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi
Dr. Radhy Shyam, PhD, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Dr. Sandeep Singh, PhD, GJUS&T, Hisar, Haryana
Dr. Sunita Malhotra, PhD, Former Dean, MD University, Rohtak, Haryana
Reviewer’s Pannel (2025-2026)
2. Prof. Arun Kumari Jaiswal, Former Prof. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
3. Prof. Sangeeta Trama, Punjabi University, Patiala
4. Prof. Annalakshmi Narayanan, Bharhityar University
Editorial Office: 1245/4, Mohalla Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India
Email: iahrw2019@gmail.com, suneil_psy@iahrw.org
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW)
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Indexing: EBSCOhost Connection Two, Academic Search Complete, The Belt and Road Initiative Reference Source, Cogito Indexing Text, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Main Edition, Biomedical Index, Google Scholar Crawl Database, SocINDEX with Full Text, Sociology Source Ultimate, ProQuest, I-scholar, Google Scholar and National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) Rating 4.42Stellenbosch University, South Africa Human Development and Family Empowermen
Author Guidelines
About the Journal
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by the Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW). The journal publishes original research articles, review papers, theoretical papers, case studies, book reviews, and short communications in the fields of social sciences, psychology, sociology, education, economics, political science, social work, management, public policy, behavioural sciences, and related interdisciplinary areas.
Manuscript Submission
Manuscripts submitted to the journal must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Submission of a manuscript implies that all authors have approved the manuscript and agree to the journal’s publication policies.
Manuscript Preparation
Title Page
The title page should contain:
- Title of the manuscript
- Full names of all authors
- Institutional affiliations
- ORCID IDs (if available)
- Corresponding author details
- Author contribution statement
Abstract
Provide an abstract of 150–250 words summarizing objectives, methodology, findings, and conclusions.
Keywords
Provide 4–6 keywords suitable for indexing and retrieval.
Main Text
Manuscripts should generally include:
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- Objectives/Hypotheses
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- References
References
All references must follow APA 7th Edition guidelines and include DOI information wherever available.
Tables and Figures
Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively and prepared according to APA guidelines.
Funding Statement
All sources of financial support, grants, sponsorships, equipment, or institutional support must be disclosed.
Conflict of Interest
Authors must declare any financial, professional, institutional, or personal conflicts of interest that may influence the research.
Author Contributions
Authors are encouraged to provide a contribution statement based on the CRediT Taxonomy.
Data Availability Statement
Authors should indicate whether data supporting the findings are publicly available, available upon request, or subject to restrictions.
Use of AI Tools
Authors may use AI tools for language editing and technical assistance. AI systems cannot be listed as authors, and all use of AI must be disclosed.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for copyrighted materials reproduced in their manuscripts.
Ethical Guidelines
Publication Ethics
The IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review adheres to the principles and best practices recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are original. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, citation manipulation, and image manipulation are strictly prohibited.
Multiple Submission
A manuscript submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by another journal simultaneously.
Authorship
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to the research and manuscript preparation. Guest, gift, and ghost authorship are not acceptable.
Research Involving Human Participants
Research involving human participants must receive approval from an appropriate ethics committee or institutional review board. Informed consent should be obtained where applicable.
Confidentiality and Privacy
Authors must protect the privacy and confidentiality of research participants and avoid publishing identifiable information without explicit consent.
Data Integrity
Authors are expected to present accurate data and findings. Any discovered errors should be promptly reported to the editor.
Research Misconduct
The journal investigates allegations of:
- Plagiarism
- Data fabrication
- Data falsification
- Duplicate publication
- Citation manipulation
- Authorship disputes
- Ethical violations
Appropriate actions may include rejection, correction, retraction, or notification to the relevant institutions.
Corrections and Retractions
The journal follows COPE recommendations regarding corrections, corrigenda, errata, expressions of concern, and retractions.
AI and Generative AI
Authors must disclose any significant use of AI tools in manuscript preparation and remain fully responsible for the content submitted.
Compliance with COPE
All participants in the publication process are expected to comply with internationally recognized publication ethics standards and COPE Core Practices.
AI-Generated Content Policy
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing follows ethical publishing standards and may have specific policies regarding the use of AI in research and writing. Authors are expected to disclose the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, ensuring that AI-generated content does not compromise originality, accuracy, or ethical integrity. For precise guidelines, it is recommended to refer to the journal’s official policy. AI content by Turnitin should be below 15%
Retraction and Correction Policy
Retraction, Correction, and Expression of Concern Policy
The Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing (IJHW) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. The journal follows the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in handling corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions.
Corrections (Erratum/Corrigendum)
A correction may be issued when a published article contains significant errors that affect the accuracy, indexing, interpretation, or reputation of the publication but do not invalidate the study’s findings. Corrections may be initiated by authors, editors, or readers.
• An Erratum is issued when the error originates from the journal or publisher.
• A Corrigendum is issued when the error originates from the author(s).
• All corrections will be linked electronically to the original article and clearly identify the changes made.
Expression of Concern
The Editor-in-Chief may publish an Expression of Concern when substantial doubts arise regarding the integrity, reliability, ethical compliance, or authorship of a published article, and an investigation is ongoing. The notice will remain associated with the article until a final decision is reached.
Retraction Policy
Articles may be retracted if:
• There is clear evidence that findings are unreliable due to misconduct or honest error.
• The work constitutes plagiarism, duplicate publication, or redundant publication.
• Data fabrication, falsification, image manipulation, or unethical research practices are identified.
• Serious violations of publication ethics are confirmed.
Retraction Procedure
- Allegations may be submitted by authors, reviewers, readers, institutions, or third parties.
- The editorial office will conduct a preliminary assessment.
- Authors will be contacted and provided an opportunity to respond.
- Where necessary, the journal may seek clarification from the affiliated institution or ethics committee.
- The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Editorial Board, will make the final decision.
- Retracted articles will remain accessible to preserve the scholarly record but will be clearly marked as “Retracted.”
- A retraction notice stating the reason for retraction will be published and linked to the original article.
Appeal
Authors may appeal editorial decisions regarding corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions by submitting a written explanation and supporting documentation to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals will be reviewed independently, and the final decision of the Editorial Board shall be binding. The journal reserves the right to update published content when necessary to protect the integrity of the scientific record and the interests of readers, researchers, and the public.
Conflict of Interest Policy
Authors are required to disclose on the title page of the initial manuscript any potential, perceived, or real conflict of interest. Authors must describe the direct/indirect financial/personal support (ownership, grants, honorarium, consultancies, etc.) in (1) the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; (2) the writing of the report; and (3) the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Authors should explicitly mention on the cover page that whether potential conflicts do or do not exit. A declaration should be made on the cover page for all types of conflicts that could affect submission to publication of a manuscript. The role of funding agencies should be clearly mentioned.
Editorial Office: 1245/18, Moh. Sainian, Hisar, Haryana, India,
Email: suneil.psy@gmail.com,
Phone: 9255442103
Publisher: IAHRW
ISSN: 2347-3797 (print version)
ISSN: . (electronic version)
Frequency: Monthly
Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted to the IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review (IJSSR) are subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality and ethically sound research. Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, academic significance, methodological quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that successfully pass the preliminary evaluation are screened for plagiarism using recognized similarity detection software, and generally a similarity index below 15% (excluding references) is considered acceptable. Eligible manuscripts are then sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s originality, theoretical and practical contribution, research design, methodological rigor, data analysis, ethical standards, clarity of presentation, and overall suitability for publication. Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the authors for revision where necessary. The original reviewers may re-evaluate revised manuscripts before a final decision is made. Based on the reviewers’ reports and editorial assessment, the Editor may decide to accept the manuscript, accept it with revisions, request major revisions, invite resubmission, or reject the manuscript. The final decision regarding publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
Manuscript Evaluation and Peer Review Process
1. Initial Manuscript Evaluation
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, scientific quality, ethical compliance, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall suitability for peer review.
2. Number of Referees Assigned
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial evaluation are typically sent to two independent expert reviewers for double-blind peer review. In cases of conflicting recommendations, a third reviewer may be invited.
3. Delivery of Peer Review Feedback
Reviewer comments and recommendations are communicated to the corresponding author through the journal’s editorial system or email. Anonymous reviewer reports are provided along with editorial guidance for revision, where applicable.
4. Typical Length of Peer Review
The peer review process generally takes 4–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability, the complexity of the manuscript, and the timeliness of responses.
5. Handling of Revise and Resubmit Requests
Authors receiving a revision decision are requested to submit a revised manuscript along with a detailed point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. Revised submissions may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.
6. Editorial Decisions
Based on reviewers’ recommendations and editorial assessment, one of the following decisions may be communicated to the author:
- Accept without Revision
- Accept with Minor Revisions
- Major Revisions Required
- Revise and Resubmit for Further Review
- Reject
Reviewer Confidentiality
Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality regarding manuscripts and associated materials.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers and editors must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when appropriate.
Appeals and Complaints
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a written justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Complaints regarding editorial procedures, peer review, or publication ethics may be submitted to the editorial office and will be handled confidentially and fairly.
Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit and are free from commercial, institutional, political, or personal influence.
Commitment to Ethical Publishing
The journal is committed to maintaining transparency, fairness, integrity, and accountability throughout the peer review and publication process in accordance with COPE principles and international best practices.
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or the Editorial Board and is communicated to the corresponding author through email along with the relevant comments and recommendations.
Page: 509-510 Gurnam Singh (GNC, Sirsa, Haryana) The present study investigated the role of psychoticism in elicitation of idiosyncratic word association long reaction time and repetition of word before responding onward association test performance. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant mean difference between high and low psychoticism group for word association test performance. To test null hypothesis the response of 200 male post graduate students for psychoticism and word association test performance were subjected to a computerized statistical analysis through SPSS 10.0 version for group statistics of median, mean, standard deviation, standard error mean and t-test for equality of means.It was found that there is a significant mean difference acceptable at 0.01 level of confidence in those high and low on psychoticism for long reaction time (t=-3.110). But the significant difference for UR (t=0.558) and RR (t=-0.771) was not observed. |
Page: 511-513 Sajjan Kumar (Department of Psychology, Govt College, Sector-1 Panchkula, Haryana) When the demands imposed on human resources are suitable in terms of their talents and resources and their amount of control over their work, it is considered a healthy job. When there is an imbalance, conflict arises. Work-related stress is one of the most potent psychological hazards of labour at the workplace. In today's fast-paced world, community care professions such as medicine, community development, crime prevention, pharmacy, educational, care for children, and occupational therapy are seen as high-stress vocations. Conflicts are arising in almost all professions. The present paper reviews on personal and organizational factors in work-life conflict. |
Page: 514-516 Radhika Mittal and Priyadarshini Purohit (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, P.O. Banasthali Vidhyapith Rajasthan) Educated women are the real legends of this mortal world, not only as they have reproductive power, but also because they can conquer the immense universe provided that their virtues are recognised globally and also acknowledged and practiced universally, most significantly within the social domains of life. They constitute one of the most educated classes, therefore, they contribute greatly in shaping the insights of the Indian youth and prove as the ultimate asset by contributing both domestically and economically to the society. But it is a great demise that in spite of various legal and constitutional safeguards and ample awareness, they could not exercise their social rights much effectively as especially the social crimes against them are increasing day by day and due to numerous causes such as patriarchal socialisation, defamation in society etc. Therefore, adequate efforts need to be taken in this regard to transfer a better legacy of access to rights to our future generations. |
Page: 517-520 Rajesh Sachdev (Department of Statistics, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi, New Delhi) Punam Midha (Department of Psychology, M.D.U, Rohtak, Haryana) Adolescence is the most vital phase of life when teens are much bothered about their self-worth, which may serve as a resource of their happiness and well-being. The present study is an attempt to examine the level of self-esteem and explore it as a pathway towards happiness and well-being of rural teens. A purposive sample of 200 adolescents, 15-18 years old, both male and female, from rural background of Rohtak district, Haryana was drawn. Standardised tools were used to assess self-esteem, happiness and well-being of adolescents. The obtained data were analysed by using descriptive statistics, exploratory data analysis, correlational as well as regression analyses were computed. The findings indicated that though adolescents were enjoying high self-esteem yet lower level of happiness. However, above moderate level of overall subjective well-being was reported, where above average level of positive well-being was observed with moderate level of ill-being. Further correlational analysis indicated the positive link of self-esteem and happiness with overall subjective well-being. Regression analysis revealed self-esteem as the predictor of both happiness as well as overall subjective well-being. The current findings endorsed the suggestion to give interventions to rural adolescents for enhancing their level of happiness. |
Page: 124-132 N. Annalakshmi1, T. Aasa2, and S. Sampath Kumar3 (Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu1,2 and Department of Sociology and Population Studies, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu3) |
Page: 133-138 Sandile Blessing Mkhwanazi1 and Victor H. Mlambo2 (Department of Public Administration, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa1 and School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa2) |
Page: 139-142 Engeline Zwane (Master of Public Administration and Management, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 143-146 N. Mabunda and O. Hlatshwayo (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, South African) |
Page: 147-155 Monica Ntombifuthi Mthethwa, Bongani T. Gamede, and Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani (Languages and Social Sciences Education, University of Zululand, South Africa) |
Page: 156-159 Hlatshwayo Oupa (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 160-167 Likhwa Ncube (Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, South Africa) |
Page: 168-174 Mabunda Nhlamulo and Kekana Paballo Penny (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 175-177 Sejabaledi A. Rankoana (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 178-183 Anchal Gupta and Babita Kumar (School of Business Studies, PAU, Ludhiana, Punjab) |
Impact of Ethnic Prejudice on Perceived Proximal Interpersonal Relationship: A Mixed Method Approach Page: 184-191 Kaustav Manna, Sumita Palit, Mouma Nag, Atanu Kumar Dogra, and Pritha Mukhopadhyay (Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata) |
Page: 192-199 Priyadarshini Purohit and Snakshi Shekhawat (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan) |
Page: 200-203 Lakshmi Pandey (Department of Psychology, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar) |
Page: 204-207 Preeti Rani and Jatesh Kathpalia (Department of Sociology, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 208-212 P. Sherin and K. V. Krishna (Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu) |
Page: 213-217 Tarini Pathak and Garima Joshi (Amity Institute of Psychology and Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida) |
Page: 218-222 Rubini T. R. and Shilpa Siby (Department of Psychology, Stella Maris College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu) |
Page: 223-230 Arpana Beniwal, Vanita Sondhi, and Noyonika Datta Banik (Department of Applied Psychology, Vivekanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi) |
Page: 231-238 Yogesh Kumar (Ex-PG Student, S.S. Jain Subhodh P.G. (Autonomous) College, Jaipur, Rajasthan) |
Page: 239-244 Harbans Lal Kaila (SNDT Women's University, Director - Forum of Behavioural Safety, Mumbai, Maharashtra) |
Page: 245-251 D.K. Janghel1, Kartik Kumar2, Harsh Raghav3, Hricha Sharma4, Riya5, Dhruv Kumar6, and Rajat7 (School of Agricultural Science (SOAS), GD Goenka University, Gurgram, Haryana1, School of Engineering & Sciences (SOES), GD Goenka University, Gurgram, Haryana2,3,6,7, and School of Medical and Allied Sciences (SOMAS), GD Goenka University, Gurgram, Haryana4,5) |
