Volumes / Issues
Showing 751 – 775 of 2773 results Showing all 2773 results Showing the single result No results found
Filters Sort results
Reset Apply
Page: 121-123 Nitin Goyal1, Ankita Sharma2, Subodh Agarwal3, and Darvinder Kumar4 (Department of Business Management, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana1,2,3 and Department of Statistics, PGDAV College, University of Delhi, Delhi4) When people think of coffee, they usually think of its ability to provide an energy boost. Coffee contains a number of useful nutrients, including riboflavin (vitamin B2), niacin (vitamin B3), magnesium, potassium, and various phenolic compounds, or antioxidants. The two most commonly grown coffee bean types are C. arabica and C. robusta. This paper, attempts to analyze the growth, level of variability/instability in area, production and productivity for both the varieties of coffee collectively and to estimate the export competitiveness of coffee grown in India using the data for the period 2000-2001 to 2019-2020. Compound growth rate technique was used to analyze the growth rate and instability was estimated using Coppock's instability index. Relative symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) technique was used to analyze the export competitiveness. The study revealed that coffee reported a positive growth rate in area (1.60%) whereas yield declined slightly at the rate of 0.76 percent per annum. The positive growth in area outpaced negative growth in yield resulting thereby positive growth in production at the rate of 0.82 percent. Highest instability was recorded for production (5.83%) which is due to the higher instability in yield (5.72%) as only small instability was recorded in area (0.88%). Further, the study indicates that there was a variation in export competitiveness of coffee from India during the period under study. India had a comparative advantage in the exports of coffee during 2000-01 to 2010-11 and 2015-16 to 2018-19 as RCA values are more than one and RSCA values are positive during this period. In rest of the years it was found comparatively non-competitive. It indicates that India has potential in coffee export. |
Page: 124-126 Yashvi (Nutrition and Dietetics, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana) The 21st century has observed an increase in the geriatric population over the years. Population of this age group is expected to outnumber the other groups of population. Therefore a good Quality of life has become one of the major concerns of the geriatric care. This study aims to study the quality of life among geriatric populations residing in Delhi region. Materials and methods: This study involved 100 individuals aged 60 years and above (70.58±7.845) from Delhi NCR region through an online survey carried out using a questionnaire developed by WHO and changes were made according to the requirements. t-test was applied for comparison of scores obtained by males and females. Results: Mean scores obtained in physical, psychological, social and environmental domain to be 11.0±1.573, 10.34±1.628, 10.13±2.023, 11.69±1.692 respectively. No significant difference was observed between qol scores of males and females. Conclusion: QOL is independent of the gender of the individual. Better QOL is experienced with better physical conditions, mental state, support from family and friends, better economic conditions and environment. Key words: Quality of life, geriatric population, Delhi region. |
Investigation of Factors Influencing the Inclination of Young People towards Fast Food in Herat City Page: 01-04 Abdul Ali Karimi1, Fazel Rahman Fazel2, Sayed Mohammad Faqiri3, and Mohammad Farid Fahiz4 (Department of Biology, Education Faculty, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan1, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan2,4, and Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan3) |
Page: 05-08 Sejabaledi A. Rankoana (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 09-13 Mathebula N.E. (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 14-20 Likhwa Ncube (Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, South Africa) |
Page: 21-28 Munzhedzi Pandelani Harry1 and Arthur Shopola2 (Department of Public & Development Administration, University of Venda, South Africa1 and Department of Public Administration and Local Government, North West University, South Africa2) |
Page: 29-32 Sejabaledi A. Rankoana (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Limpopo, South Africa) |
Page: 33-41 Patrick A. Nyathi (Department of Languages and Social Sciences, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa) |
Page: 42-49 Aasa T. and Annalakshmi N. (Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu) |
Page: 50-54 Krishna S. Maraddi1, P. S. Kattimani2, and Vidya V. Hanchinal3 (Deputy Librarian, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad1, Librarian, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi2, and Librarian, SKM's J M Patel College of Commerce, Goregaon (W), Mumbai3) |
Page: 55-59 Preeti1, Vinod Kumari2, Ruchi3, and Ajay Sharma4 (Department of Sociology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana1,2,3 and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana4) |
Page: 60-64 Pratibha Khutan1 and Suninder Tung2 (Department of Psychology, DAV University, Jalandhar, Punjab1 and Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab2) |
Page: 65-68 Tamsha and Sandeep Singh (Department of Applied Psychology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 69-73 Safina and Habeebul Rahiman (Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi) |
Page: 74-80 Subhash Chander, Jatesh Kathpalia, Vinod Kumari, and Bas Kaur (Department of Sociology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 81-84 Saima Nazir1 and Khushboo Nazir2 (Department of Commerce, University of Kashmir, J&K1, Accounts Officer GIF, NIT, Sri Nagar2) |
Page: 85-89 Namita Mohanty (Department of Psychology, KISS-DU, Bhubaneswar, Odisha) |
Page: 90-97 Vikrant Hooda and Ritu Hooda (School of Commerce and Management (SCM), Om Sterling Global University, Hisar, Haryana) |
Page: 98-103 Divya Rani and Neena Kohli (Department of Psychology, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj0 |
Page: 104-107 Sunanda (Department of Home Science, Adarsh Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhiwani, Haryana) |
Page: 108-110 Cheryl Jolly and Shivani (Department of Psychology, School of Liberal Arts, Noida International University, Greater Noida) |
Page: 111-115 Rupan Dhillon (Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab) |
Page: 116-118 Sunanda (Department of Home Science, Adarsh Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhiwani, Haryana) |
Page: 119-123 Preetika1 and Ravneet Chawla2 (Government Home Science College, Sector 10, Chandigarh1 and Government College of Education, Sector 20, Chandigarh2) |